In a statement, the Bar Association said “The Jamaican Bar Association notes with concern the statements of the attorney general of Jamaica that suggest that the judgements of the court are not guided by the law, that the law is put aside 'both procedurally and substantially', and that 'matters are determined in other ways'.”
“We consider such statements to have the effect of undermining public confidence in the judiciary and the rule of law. For an attorney-at-law, particularly the attorney general of Jamaica who is designated under Section 79 of the Constitution of Jamaica to be the 'principal legal advisor to the Government of Jamaica' and therefore can be deemed to be stating the views of the Government of Jamaica when making such statements, is deeply concerning,” the JBA added.
“The promotion and upholding of public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary and the sanctity of judicial rulings is of central importance to our entire system of justice. We call upon the learned attorney general to publicly withdraw such utterances and to publicly support our system of justice from which all Jamaicans benefit,” the association said further.
The attorney general, in a tweet later that evening, said “if ever our #CourtsofLaw” cease to be guided by, or apply the law and instead become courts of public opinion, special interest, personal interest or anything less, then therein lies the biggest threat to our democracy”.
Attorney General, Marlene Malahoo Forte, has criticized the Judiciary after a Supreme Court judge declared the continued detention of five men under the States of Public emergency as unconstitutional.https://t.co/jj5AF9ruvU— Nationwide90FM (@Nationwideradio) July 23, 2020
In an earlier tweet the attorney general said “media reports about unconstitutionality of detention under #SOPE in matter ruled by single judge who heard the application for writ of habeas corpus cannot be correct”.
In a statement, the attorney general said it was never her intention to either attack any judge or undermine public confidence in the judiciary. “It is truly regrettable that my comments have been so interpreted,” she said. “The judiciary of Jamaica can be assured of my unwavering support and that of the Administration of which I am a part,” she added.
Justice Bertram Morrison, in his oral judgement on Wednesday, reportedly said that “a man's freedom could not be arbitrarily taken away without a final determination by the court”. He said further that the Emergency Powers Act (EPA), the Emergency Powers Regulation (EPR), and detention orders are in breach of the constitution. The judge also pointed out that in a free and democratic society, a man cannot be detained until the end of the state of emergency.
The ruling was handed down after attorneys for the men filed separate legal challenges.
The written judgement is expected to be made available shortly.
- Countries: Jamaica
- JAMAICA | Fitz Jackson notes gun violence crisis yet delay in signing security MOU with US gov't
- JAMAICA | PNP Chairman says no marriage of Banking Services Bill with SOE
- TT | Trinidad moves to decriminalize ganja, promote medicinal cannabis
- JAMAICA | AG Malahoo-Forte differs with Gov't on NIDS Judgement
- GUYANA | Attorney General appeals Chief Justice ruling on no-confidence motion