A new study out in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences finds that among all the strategies for reducing transmission, wearing face masks may be the central variable that determines the spread of the virus.
The study undertaken by a team from Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin, California Institute of Technology, and the University of California San Diego, write in their paper that “Our analysis reveals that the difference with and without mandated face covering represents the determinant in shaping the trends of the pandemic.”
They analyzed the various mitigation measures put in place in the three major centers of the outbreak—Wuhan, Italy, and New York City—from January 23 to May 9, 2020. The team also looked at the slopes of the curves representing the number of new cases, and how they changed after each measure was mandated.
According to the study, in NYC, the stay-at-home and physical distancing orders didn’t do a lot: the curve really started to change after masks were mandatory. They compare this to the U.S. overall, which never put in place a face-covering policy.
Daily new confirmed infections in (A) NYC and (B) the United States. The dotted lines represent ... [+]Zhang et al 2020, courtesy PNAS
And in Wuhan, the response was not only swift, but multiple measures—namely, social distancing, lockdown, and face coverings—were put in place simultaneously.
In the U.S., it was slower, and importantly, sequential, making it much less effective. “[T]he response to the pandemic was generally slow in the western world, and implementation of the intervention measures occurred only consecutively,” the authors write.
“Clearly, the responsiveness of the mitigation measures governed the evolution, scope, and magnitude of the pandemic globally.”
The team also looked at how the virus, in droplets and aerosols, travels in the air; how fast it travels; the weather conditions in the respective geographic locations; the “dose” and effectiveness of how it infects the respiratory system; and other variables. "Our results clearly show that airborne transmission via respiratory aerosols represents the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19," said study author Renyi Zhang in a statement.
When paired with the data on how the curve changed in response to the mitigation methods, this all makes sense—the takeaway being that face masks are likely the major determinant of how the infection spreads or slows.
"Our study establishes very clearly that using a face mask is not only useful to prevent infected coughing droplets from reaching uninfected persons, but is also crucial for these uninfected persons to avoid breathing the minute atmospheric particles (aerosols) that infected people emit when talking and that can remain in the atmosphere tens of minutes and can travel tens of feet," said study author Mario Molina in a statement.
Indeed, a study last month in the same journal showed that just talking loudly in a room released droplets that lingered in the air for a long time.
The research carried out by a team from the NIH and University of Pennsylvania, shows how long speech-generated droplets can linger in the air: not cough- or sneeze-generated droplets, but plain old conversation level emissions. The answer is that they can stay airborne for anywhere between eight and 14 minutes.
The authors, acknowledging that coughing and sneezing are well known to distribute virus-via-droplets far and wide, set out to see how long droplets generated from loud taking could linger, and how large a number was detectible. They used a setup that had been used in previous studies, in which a speaker spoke a phrase (“stay healthy”) for 25 seconds into an open end of a cardboard box. The inside was lit with lasers that could track and measure the droplet spray the speaker produced. (The phrase was chosen partly because the “th” sound was “found to be an efficient generator of oral fluid speech droplets.”)
This new study also echoes the update made by the CDC recently, stating that while transmission by infected surfaces (e.g., touching a doorknob that a sick person coughed on) was possible, it’s not the main route of infection—air is.
Interestingly, the team also calculated how many people were likely spared from infection by wearing face coverings.
"By analyzing the pandemic trends without face-covering using the statistical method and by projecting the trend, we calculated that over 66,000 infections were prevented by using a face mask in little over a month in New York City,” said Zhang.
In Italy the number was 78,000. “We conclude that wearing a face mask in public corresponds to the most effective means to prevent inter-human transmission. This inexpensive practice, in conjunction with social distancing and other procedures, is the most likely opportunity to stop the COVID-19 pandemic."
As states continue to reopen and many see steady rises in infection rates, they should heed the message in the findings of studies like this one.
Finally, the researchers make the important point that science must be the foundation upon which pandemic policy is based. It’s unfortunate that we live in a time where this point has to be made, and repeated, but here we are.
They write that “sound science should be effectively communicated to policy makers and should constitute the prime foundation in decision-making amid this pandemic. Implementing policies without a scientific basis could lead to catastrophic consequences, particularly in light of attempts to reopen the economy in many countries.”
- Countries: None
- How COVID-19 could impact travel for years to come
- The loneliness of social isolation can affect your brain and raise dementia risk in older adults
- BAHAMAS | COVID-19 spread Initiates Nationwide lockdown in the Bahamas
- BARBADOS | Nine of 95 Ghanaian nurses test positive for COVID-19
- JAMAICA | Jamaica to Recover Stronger - PM Holness