GUYANA | Opposition MP Walton-Desir Sounds Alarm Over Parliament Corruption Ban Ahead of Budget Debates

GEORGETOWN, Guyana, January 19, 2025 - In a sharp rebuke to parliamentary restrictions, Opposition Member of Parliament Amanza Walton-Desir has challenged the Speaker's recent hardline stance on banned words in Guyana's National Assembly, warning that outdated colonial-era rules threaten to muzzle crucial budget discussions.

The controversy erupted after Government Chief Whip Gail Teixeira acknowledged the need to modernize the Assembly's list of prohibited words - which notably includes the term "corruption" - even as Speaker Manzoor Nadir doubled down on Friday, threatening to penalize MPs with reduced speaking time for utterances deemed offensive under the existing rules.

"The timing couldn't be more critical," Walton-Desir argued in a statement released today. "We're approaching national budget debates where every word matters, yet we're still bound by linguistic handcuffs that belong in a museum, not a modern parliament."

The parliamentary clash has exposed a curious contradiction: while the government agrees that the prohibitions need updating, the Speaker's office appears determined to enforce these restrictions more stringently than ever, creating what Walton-Desir describes as a "counterproductive" barrier to meaningful debate.

Seizing on the government's acknowledgment that reform is needed, Walton-Desir has called for immediate action rather than promises of future change.

"The word 'corruption' must be allowed in parliamentary debates forthwith," she insisted, highlighting the urgency of updating the rules before the upcoming budget discussions.

House Speaker Manzoor Nadir

Critics argue that maintaining colonial-era restrictions not only hampers effective debate but also prevents legislators from directly addressing pressing issues facing the nation.

The inability to use certain terms, they contend, forces MPs to resort to euphemisms that dilute the impact of their arguments.

At the heart of the dispute lies a fundamental question: how can parliament balance its traditions of decorum with the need for frank, unvarnished debate?

While the Speaker's office maintains that the rules ensure civilized discourse, opposition members like Walton-Desir counter that they serve mainly to shield the government from legitimate criticism.

As budget season approaches, all eyes are on whether the National Assembly will move swiftly to modernize its rules, or whether MPs will once again find themselves navigating a linguistic minefield while attempting to represent their constituents' interests.

The resolution of this linguistic standoff may well determine the tone and effectiveness of the upcoming budget debates.

With both the Opposition and the Government Chief Whip acknowledging the need for change, pressure is mounting on the Speaker's office to find a swift compromise.

Until then, Walton-Desir's challenge stands as a stark reminder that in Guyana's parliament, the battle over words remains inextricably linked to the battle over substance.

-30-