JAMAICA | Golding Flays Gov't over wanting to keep Jamaicans in the dark over constitutional Reform

KINGSTON, Jamaica, May 14, 2024 - In the midst of ongoing debates over Jamaica's constitutional reform, tension has escalated between the government and opposition. The latest developments have seen Leader of the Opposition, Mark Golding, accusing the government of a lack of consensus and transparency in handling critical issues pivotal to the reform of the Jamaican Constitution.

Mark Golding's strong assertions stem from recent actions taken by Marlene Malahoo Forte, Co-Chair of the Constitutional Reform Committee (CRC). Golding claims that Malahoo Forte failed to circulate a crucial document among committee members that highlighted several significant concerns with the proposed reforms.

Instead, this document was reportedly submitted directly to the Cabinet last Monday without prior review or discussion among the committee members, including those from the opposition.

During a media briefing on Tuesday, Golding emphasized the opposition's responsible and genuine participation in the reform process. He expressed dismay over the government's approach, suggesting that it sought to shift blame onto the opposition rather than address substantive issues.

"The public should not be misled by current narratives. We have substantial concerns about the contents of the report and fundamental issues rooted in our party's philosophy that need to be addressed," Golding stated. He further stressed the need for direct communication from the Prime Minister to advance any collaborative efforts on the reform.

The CRC report has not garnered the signatures of opposition representatives, signaling deep-seated discontent. A primary point of contention for the opposition is the proposal to transition away from the British Monarch as Jamaica's head of state, which they argue should coincide with moving away from the Privy Council as the final Court of Appeal.

This rift highlights the broader challenges facing Jamaica's ambitious constitutional reform project, intended to redefine governance and legal frameworks in the nation. The absence of consensus and the emerging public debate underscore the complexities of achieving substantial constitutional changes in a politically divided environment.

The government, on the other hand, has yet to formally respond to these accusations. However, sources close to the administration argue that the submission of the CRC report to the Cabinet was a procedural necessity to keep the reform process on schedule.

They contend that all members of the committee, including the opposition, had ample opportunities to voice concerns during the committee's deliberations. Marlene Malahoo Forte has emphasized the inclusive nature of the discussions, stating that the CRC has always strived to operate transparently and democratically.

Amidst this contentious backdrop, the broader implications for Jamaica's political landscape are becoming increasingly apparent. The public's reaction has been mixed, with some expressing support for the government's efforts to push forward with the reforms, while others echo the opposition's calls for a more inclusive and transparent process.

This division is reflective of the historical challenges Jamaica has faced in achieving consensus on constitutional matters, further complicated by current political dynamics.

The potential consequences of these developments are significant. If the reform process continues to be mired in controversy and lacks broad-based support, it could undermine the legitimacy of any changes made and possibly lead to greater political instability.

The situation calls for careful navigation, with both sides needing to engage in more open dialogue and compromise to align on the vision of Jamaica's constitutional future.

This unfolding scenario presents a critical juncture for Jamaica, as it seeks to redefine its governance structure in a way that both respects its democratic traditions and meets the aspirations of its people. As the debate continues, the eyes of the nation remain fixed on the actions of its leaders, hoping for resolution that can move Jamaica forward unitedly and securely.

-30-