Opposition housing spokesman celebrates institution that housed 1M+ Jamaicans while condemning government's extraction of billions from workers' fund
The National Housing Trust's 50th anniversary has become a study in contradictions—a celebration of Jamaica's most transformative housing institution shadowed by accusations that its core mandate has been systematically betrayed.
Opposition Spokesperson on Housing and Sustainable Living, Professor Senator Floyd Morris, delivered a pointed dual message this week: praise for five decades of achievement coupled with scathing criticism of a government that extracts $11.4 billion annually from workers' contributions while building luxury homes the contributors themselves cannot afford.
"The NHT stands as one of the most consequential developmental institutions in the history of Jamaica," Morris declared, setting a tone of celebration before pivoting sharply to condemnation. The numbers support his tribute—300,000 houses built over five decades, lives of more than one million Jamaicans transformed, communities reshaped from "wattle and daub, thatch houses and bamboo to more permanent and elegant concrete structures.
"Few corners of Jamaica remain untouched by the institution Michael Manley created in 1976 after hearing "the cries of Jamaica's workers as it relates to housing."
But Morris's commemoration carries a bitter edge. The same institution that revolutionized Jamaica's housing landscape now produces $25 million and $40 million properties—price points that mock the very workers whose mandatory contributions fund the Trust.
"This is not what Michael Manley established the NHT to do," Morris stressed, drawing a line between the founder's vision of affordable housing for working people and today's reality of luxury developments serving those who need assistance least.
The $11.4 billion annual extraction represents the heart of Morris's critique—a government raid on workers' contributions to patch budget holes rather than build the homes contributors desperately need. These funds, Morris argues, "should remain within the NHT to expand the construction of affordable housing for contributors, particularly young Jamaicans who are being priced out of the market."
The mathematics of betrayal are straightforward: workers contribute faithfully to a fund theoretically designed to help them achieve homeownership, only to watch billions redirected to government operations while the houses actually built drift further beyond their financial reach. Young Jamaicans face a cruel irony—mandatory deductions from their paychecks funding an institution increasingly irrelevant to their housing prospects.
Morris and Opposition Leader Mark Golding have repeatedly called for the NHT to be "restored to its original purpose," warning that mission dilution over the past decade threatens to transform Manley's legacy into its opposite. Where Manley created an institution to serve workers, the current iteration increasingly serves budget balancing and upscale development.
The contrast between Manley's vision and present reality grows starker with each passing year. Manley moved "decisively to create an institution that would become a colossus" for working people. That colossus now builds communities—but increasingly not for the workers whose contributions make construction possible. The footprint spans "the length and breadth of the island," as Morris notes, but the question becomes: whose housing needs are actually being met?
Perhaps most galling is the spectacle of workers financing their own exclusion from the housing market. Mandatory NHT contributions represent a significant portion of workers' earnings—money extracted with the promise of eventual housing assistance, then redirected to luxury developments and budget supplementation.
Young Jamaicans watch their deductions disappear into a system that offers $25 million solutions to people earning wages that make such prices fantastical.
Morris's call to "repurpose the NHT and restore it to its core mandate of building affordable houses for the people" represents more than opposition rhetoric—it's a demand that Jamaica honor the social contract at the heart of Manley's vision.
Workers agreed to mandatory contributions in exchange for housing assistance. The government's response has been to redefine "assistance" upward until it excludes the very people the system was designed to serve.
The 50th anniversary offers Jamaica a choice: celebrate the NHT's extraordinary achievements while accepting its transformation into something Manley would barely recognize, or use this milestone to demand restoration of original purpose. Morris has issued that demand clearly—stop the $11.4 billion annual extraction, refocus on affordable housing, serve the workers who fund the institution.
Whether government will heed that call remains uncertain. What is certain is that hundreds of thousands of Jamaicans continue contributing to a fund increasingly disconnected from their housing reality, watching billions flow to budget operations and luxury developments while their own prospects for homeownership recede further into impossibility.
Manley built the NHT for workers. Fifty years later, the question is whether workers still factor into its mission—or whether they've become merely the funding source for other priorities.
-30-
