GUYANA | Condemning AG Nandlall's Insensitive Remarks - Disrespecting our National Identity

GEORGETOWN, Guyana, August 2025 - In a country where we are still fighting to ensure that all Guyanese have an equal stake in our national heritage, it is particularly disheartening when a figure of national prominence, especially one entrusted with upholding the law, chooses to trample upon the very values that should unite us as a people.

Attorney General Anil Nandlall's recent comments at a PPP/C rally, where he purportedly stated there is "nothing wrong with being proud house slaves," are not only deeply offensive but also an affront to the dignity of every Guyanese citizen, especially the descendants of those who fought for freedom, justice, and equality.

I must be clear: this is not an abstract attack on political opponents; it is a moral and ethical condemnation of the utter disrespect shown to the sacrifices of our ancestors, most notably our national hero, Cuffy, who led a historic rebellion against the colonial and oppressive forces in the 18th century. 

To reduce such a hero, a symbol of resistance against dehumanisation and cruelty, to the status of a "proud house slave" is not only historically inaccurate but also egregiously insulting.

Anil Nandlall, as the Attorney General of the Republic of Guyana, ought to understand that words carry weight, especially for someone who occupies such a revered position in our legal system. When a senior government official, with access to the national stage, makes such comments, it is an endorsement of ignorance, and it sends a message that is both reckless and divisive.

Cuffy: A Hero, Not a "Proud House Slave"

Let us remind ourselves of who Cuffy truly was. Cuffy, the heroic enslaved African who led the Berbice Slave Revolt of 1763, was not a house slave but a symbol of resistance. He fought for freedom from the shackles of colonialism and the brutal system of enslavement that sought to dehumanize him and his people.

Cuffy's rebellion was one of the first major challenges to European colonial dominance in the Caribbean, and it reverberated across the Americas as a pivotal moment in the history of slave uprisings. 

To suggest that Cuffy, or any individual like him who fought against the systemic oppression of slavery, would ever consider himself a "proud house slave" is not only inaccurate but also disgracefully diminishes the sacrifices made by Cuffy and countless others who fought to bring an end to the horrors of enslavement.

It is beyond belief that someone, particularly Anil Nandlall, who claims to represent the people, would degrade the legacy of such a figure. Cuffy was a freedom fighter, not a collaborator with the system of slavery. His actions were rooted in the desire to abolish slavery, to rise above the brutalizing forces of colonial oppression, and to bring liberty and dignity to those who were born into a system that regarded them as property.

The Rudeness, Insensitivity, and Racism of the Remark

To call the statement made by Anil Nandlall anything less than crude, insensitive, and profoundly offensive is an understatement. It betrays not just a lack of historical awareness, but an egregious disregard for the deep wounds that slavery and its legacies have left on our society.

The comment that there is "nothing wrong with being a proud house slave" reflects a deeply rooted insensitivity to the lived experiences of those whose ancestors were subjected to the worst forms of cruelty imaginable.

This was not a slip of the tongue, nor a harmless jest. It was a statement that invoked the worst aspects of Guyana's colonial history. In one remark, Nandlall dismissed the agony, trauma, and resilience of generations of enslaved Africans whose only crime was their skin color.

For anyone to suggest that those subjected to this dehumanisation should somehow wear it as a badge of pride is to ignore the painful truth of our history.

This statement, which was deliberate and intentional, reinforces harmful racial stereotypes that have no place in any modern, inclusive society. It is a stain on the office Nandlall holds.

His duty as Attorney General is to uphold justice, fairness, and dignity for all Guyanese. To engage in such reckless rhetoric only sows division and resentment, and undermines the very values that our nation is built upon.

A Call to Action: Respect and Accountability

It is incumbent upon every leader in our country to recognise the responsibility they bear to uphold the dignity of every citizen, regardless of race, ethnicity, or history.

Words matter, especially when uttered by those in positions of power. Anil Nandlall must be held accountable for this egregious statement, which has done a disservice not only to Cuffy’s memory but also to the millions of Guyanese who still struggle against the legacy of colonialism and racism.

As a nation, we must be clear: we will not tolerate the erasure of our painful history, nor will we stand by when those in positions of power seek to perpetuate offensive, divisive, and historically inaccurate narratives.

The sacrifices made by our ancestors, especially the likes of Cuffy, must be honored with the respect and dignity they deserve.

I call on the Government of Guyana to issue an unequivocal apology for these hurtful remarks. We must reaffirm our commitment to building a society where the legacies of our national heroes—especially those who fought for freedom—are treated with the respect they deserve. We must work toward a future where unity, not division, guides us in shaping our collective identity.

The history of Guyana is one of resilience, resistance, and renewal. Let us not allow it to be marred by insensitive, divisive, and downright offensive comments from those in positions of authority. The legacy of Cuffy and all of our heroes must remain untarnished by such recklessness.

-30-