Opposition Leader Mark Golding delivering his budget speech on Tuesday
Opposition Leader Mark Golding delivering his budget speech on Tuesday

A half-century after Michael Manley built the National Housing Trust as a fortress of social justice, Jamaica's government has reduced it to a piggy bank — and Budget Day 2026 proves nothing has changed.

Calvin G. Brown 

When Michael Manley stood before the Jamaican Parliament in 1976 and championed the creation of the National Housing Trust, he was doing something radical.

He was telling Jamaica's working poor — the cane-cutters and schoolteachers, the market vendors and hotel maids — that their weekly contributions would build them a home. Not a favour. Not charity. A right.

Fifty years later, that promise is being methodically dismantled, Budget cycle by Budget cycle, with the indifference of an administration that has perfected the art of raiding the poor man's fund.

On Tuesday, Opposition Leader Mark Golding rose during the Budget Debate to deliver a damning indictment: the Andrew Holness government is again withdrawing $11.4 billion from the National Housing Trust — not to build homes, not to shelter families still reeling from Hurricane Melissa's devastation, but to plug holes in the general budget.

It is a transaction so routine it barely raises eyebrows in Kingston's political class. That numbness is itself a scandal.

"One hundred billion dollars. In a country where the housing deficit is measured not in thousands but in the lived despair of families crammed into zinc-roofed structures, waiting on a housing scheme that never comes."

The arithmetic is staggering. Since 2016, more than $100 billion has been extracted from the NHT under successive JLP administrations. One hundred billion dollars. In a country where the housing deficit is measured not in thousands but in the lived despair of families crammed into zinc-roofed structures, sleeping three to a bed, waiting on a housing scheme that never comes.

One hundred billion dollars that could have built communities. Instead, it built nothing — except a convenient line item in the Finance Minister's spreadsheet.

Golding's charge is unambiguous: "This is not the time to be taking money out of the NHT. These are resources that should be used to rebuild homes and restore dignity to families who have lost everything." He is right, of course. But he understates the historical wound.

Ideological Vandalism

What is happening to the NHT is not merely poor fiscal management. It is ideological vandalism.

Manley's NHT was never designed as a savings pool for government convenience. It was an instrument of economic democracy — a mechanism through which ordinary Jamaicans, through compulsory wage-related contributions, would accumulate collective power to own the ground beneath their feet.

It was Manley's answer to the plantation logic that kept the Black Jamaican worker permanently dispossessed: landless, rootless, forever dependent on the grace of property-owners and corporate landlords. The NHT was meant to break that cycle.

Hurricane Melissa has made the betrayal visceral. Across the island, families who lost their homes to the storm have been waiting — waiting for the kind of institutional support the NHT was built to provide. Instead, they find those resources diverted, and the Trust's core mandate hollowed out in the name of fiscal flexibility.

The government speaks of stability and prudent management. The families on waiting lists speak a different language: hunger, desperation, loss.

What was introduced years ago as a temporary measure during Jamaica's debt crisis has calcified into permanent policy. The government has grown addicted to NHT funds as a supplementary revenue stream, and the contributors — the very workers whose fortnightly deductions sustain the Trust — have been left as bystanders to their own dispossession.

A Firewall, Not Just a Demand

The PNP's call is clear: end the withdrawals. Return the NHT to its founding mandate. Prioritise the workers, the storm-displaced, the families who have been contributing faithfully for years and received nothing in return.

But demands alone will not reverse fifty years of creeping betrayal. What Jamaica needs is a legislative firewall — a statutory prohibition that makes raiding the NHT as politically toxic as it is morally indefensible. The NHT's funds belong to contributors, not to Cabinet ministers with budget shortfalls to paper over.

Michael Manley envisioned a Jamaica where working people owned their futures. The question for Budget 2026 is stark and demands an honest answer: Whose side is this government on?

The answer, measured in $100 billion and counting, speaks for itself.

— Calvin G. Brown | Politics & Economy | WiredJa

-30-

Please fill the required field.
Image